On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > Note I said allowed, not supported. I refuse to support any binary > only modules, my standard response to problems logged against binary > modules is "remove them and reproduce the problem". Checking for ABI > violations is not supporting binary modules, it is detecting that they > are stuffed and telling the user to go pester their supplier instead of > polluting l-k with questions that will be ignored. Sensible. As long as it doesn't give rise to reports of the type "modutils didn't whinge so it's not the binary-only module's fault." -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Christian Zander
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in ... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct-... Russell King
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct-... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct-... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_str... David Woodhouse