On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, David Woodhouse wrote: > > But I have no particular attachment to it. All I'm asking for is a way to > avoid having init order dependencies where previously there was no need > for them, by having a way to put entries in the inter_module_get() table > at compile time. Note that previously there _were_ order dependencies. In fact, I consider it very tasteless to have modules that act differently on whether another module is loaded. I saw some arguments saying that this is th "right thing", and I disagree completely. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in ... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap... Russell King
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... Keith Owens
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->u... David Woodhouse
- Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Christian Zander