Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:13:17 +0530
> Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> They say better strike when the iron is hot.
>>
>> Since we have so many people discussing the memory controller, I would
>> like to access the readiness of the memory controller for mainline
>> merge.
>
>> At the VM-Summit we decided to try the current double LRU approach for
>> memory control. At this juncture in the space-time continuum, I seek
>> your support, feedback, comments and help to move the memory controller
>
> The memory controller code currently in -mm seems fine to me,
> especially with the changes that got committed over the last
> days making reclaim more efficient.
>
Yes, I agree. Per zone reclaim and lists have helped make the code
better. Credit goes to KAMEZAWA-San for the per zone code and to
YAMAMOTO-San for background reclaim.
> I don't think there are any bugs left that can be found by
> code inspection - only the kind of testing that the mainline
> kernel gets might shake out more bugs.
>
> I would like to see the memory controller code go into the
> mainline kernel ASAP.
>
Excellent, thanks!
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
