On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Coiby Xu <coiby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:16 PM Coiby Xu <coiby...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> >> + if (tmr_large) {
> >> + if (tmr_out_unit)
> >> + unit = 62500;
> >> + else
> >
> >> + unit = 15600;
> >
> >Side note: Hmm... Shouldn't be 15625? As 1/4.
>
> Thank you for discovering the inconsistency! I wrote these code based on
> amd_gpio_set_debounce. I'll send an email to the original author to
> confirm it.
>
> static int amd_gpio_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset,
> unsigned debounce)
> {
> ...
> if (debounce) {
> pin_reg |= DB_TYPE_REMOVE_GLITCH << DB_CNTRL_OFF;
> pin_reg &= ~DB_TMR_OUT_MASK;
> /*
> Debounce Debounce Timer Max
> TmrLarge TmrOutUnit Unit Debounce
> Time
> 0 0 61 usec (2 RtcClk) 976 usec
> 0 1 244 usec (8 RtcClk) 3.9 msec
> 1 0 15.6 msec (512 RtcClk) 250 msec
> 1 1 62.5 msec (2048 RtcClk) 1 sec
> */
What the heck with HW companies! (Just an emotion based on the experience)
They like to use really bad precision when it's clear that the numbers
should be different (note the cycles, it's 1/4 sharp ratio).
> if (debounce < 61) {
> pin_reg |= 1;
> pin_reg &= ~BIT(DB_TMR_OUT_UNIT_OFF);
> pin_reg &= ~BIT(DB_TMR_LARGE_OFF);
> } else if (debounce < 976) {
> time = debounce / 61;
> pin_reg |= time & DB_TMR_OUT_MASK;
> pin_reg &= ~BIT(DB_TMR_OUT_UNIT_OFF);
> pin_reg &= ~BIT(DB_TMR_LARGE_OFF);
> ...
> >
> >> + } else {
> >> + if (tmr_out_unit)
> >> + unit = 244;
> >> + else
> >> + unit = 61;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
