David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't like this -- it shouldn't be necessary.
Actually, I think you're right. I think the problem is that:
if (uaddr != MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
/* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
}
Should be:
if (uaddr == MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
/* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
}
Otherwise the finfo->uaddr[] table is useless because only the first row will
be used, except for unsupported configurations where uaddr will be set to
MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED.
With the ASB2303 bootprom I need to use the second row because it's in the x16
configuration, *not* the x8.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
