On 2020-10-26 13:25, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 08:47:50AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.

 0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function"
 1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows, I give up!"

SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED might as well mean "workaround required, except calling this function may not work because it isn't implemented in some
cases". Wonderful. We map this SMC call to

 0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
 1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
 SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

For KVM hypercalls (hvc), we've implemented this function id to return
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. One of those
isn't supposed to be there. Per the code we call
arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() to figure out what to return for this
feature discovery call.

 0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
 SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
 SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Let's clean this up so that KVM tells the guest this mapping:

 0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
 1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
 SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Note: SMCCC_RET_NOT_AFFECTED is 1 but isn't part of the SMCCC spec

Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.pr...@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest [1]
Fixes: c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
---

I see that before commit c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full
Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests") we had this mapping:

 0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
 SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

so the return value '1' wasn't there then. Once the commit was merged we
introduced the notion of NOT_REQUIRED here when it shouldn't have been
introduced.

Changes from v2:
 * Moved define to header file and used it

Changes from v1:
 * Way longer commit text, more background (sorry)
 * Dropped proton-pack part because it was wrong
 * Rebased onto other patch accepted upstream

 arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c | 2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c     | 2 +-
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h       | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
index 25f3c80b5ffe..c18eb7d41274 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
@@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ static enum mitigation_state spectre_v2_get_cpu_hw_mitigation_state(void)
        return SPECTRE_VULNERABLE;
 }

-#define SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED   (1)
-
static enum mitigation_state spectre_v2_get_cpu_fw_mitigation_state(void)
 {
        int ret;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
index 9824025ccc5c..25ea4ecb6449 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                                val = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
                                break;
                        case SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED:
-                               val = SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED;
+                               val = SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED;
                                break;
                        }
                        break;
diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index 15c706fb0a37..0e50ba3e88d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@
                           ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,                            \
                           0, 0x7fff)

+#define SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED   1

I thought we'd stick this in asm/spectre.h, but here is also good:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>

Will, if you're about to send fixes to Linus, can you please pick
this one up?

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Reply via email to