On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:47:50 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the
> ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and
> SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.
>
> 0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function"
> 1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function"
> SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows,
> I give up!"
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] KVM: arm64: ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 doesn't return
SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1de111b51b82
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
