On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0600, Matt Porter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be > > bothered to follow > > the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can > > be supported. > > Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead > > of turning > > sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds. > > What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of > those > versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci > Arasan core > running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the > separation > patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree.
I need to go back and try and sort out the last of Pierre's last comments, and update to the latest kernel version. I was waiting for 2.6.24-rc4 to re-start the effort to try and ensure there are fewer changes due to fixes. -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
