On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 04:25:36PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:57:23AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote:
> > From: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> >
> > When SPE records a physical address, it can additionally tag the event
> > with information from the Memory Tagging architecture extension.
> >
> > Decode the two additional fields in the SPE event payload.
> >
> > [leoy: Refined patch to use predefined macros]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 6 +++++-
> > tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > index 3fca65e9cbbf..9ec3057de86f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr(const struct
> > arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> > char *buf, size_t buf_len)
> > {
> > int ns, el, idx = packet->index;
> > + int ch, pat;
> > u64 payload = packet->payload;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > @@ -388,9 +389,12 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr(const struct
> > arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> > "VA 0x%llx", payload);
> > case SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_DATA_PHYS:
> > ns = !!SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_NS(payload);
> > + ch = !!SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_CH(payload);
> > + pat = SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_PAT(payload);
> > payload = SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTES_0_6(payload);
> > return arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&err, &buf, &buf_len,
> > - "PA 0x%llx ns=%d", payload, ns);
> > + "PA 0x%llx ns=%d ch=%d, pat=%x",
>
> Nit: given that this data is all closely related, do we really want the
> extra comma here?
No reason for adding comma. Will remove it.
> (Note, I am not familiar with how this text is consumed, so if there are
> other reasons why the comma is needed then that's probably fine.)
>
> > + payload, ns, ch, pat);
> > default:
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > index 7032fc141ad4..1ad14885c2a1 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
> >
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_NS(v) (((v) & BIT_ULL(63)) >>
> > 63)
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_EL(v) (((v) & GENMASK_ULL(62,
> > 61)) >> 61)
> > +#define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_CH(v) (((v) & BIT_ULL(62)) >>
> > 62)
> > +#define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_PAT(v) (((v) & GENMASK_ULL(59,
> > 56)) >> 56)
>
> These seem to match the spec.
>
> With or without addressing the nit above:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@arm.com>
Thanks for reviewing.
> [...]
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
