> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Florian Weimer > Sent: 15 January 2001 13:02 > To: Gerhard Mack > Cc: Linux Kernel List > Subject: Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? > > The security record of Proftpd is not horrid, but embarrassing. They > once claimed to have fixed vulnerability, but in fact introduced > another one... Oh, come on, this is a classic event in bug fixing. All Software Has Bugs [TM]. Nothing Is Completely Secure [TM]. As long as the vulnerabilities are fixed as they happen (where possible), we should be happy. Tris. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Gerhard Mack
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? J Sloan
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Michael Peddemors
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Florian Weimer
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tristan Greaves
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Dan Hollis
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jonathan Thackray
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Matti Aarnio
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jonathan Thackray
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support... dean gaudet
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support... Linus Torvalds