On 2020-11-04 13:47:46 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > Yes, Just fired up signaltest 5 times for arm64 and x86_64 with the > > latest release. Keep you posted. > > arm64 > 1184 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 386.00 > 1185 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 417.00 > 1186 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 350.00 > 1187 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 360.00 > 1188 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 339.00 > > I noticed that also the last view 5.9-rt releases have higher values. > For example, version 5.9.0-rc8-rt12 has only 217us. > > x86_64 > 1189 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 50.00 > 1190 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 46.00 > 1191 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 45.00 > 1192 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : pass 47.00 > 1193 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 52.00 > > Same thing for version 5.9.0-rc8-rt12, the max value was 40us. > > I'll work on getting these reports more useful, the performance trend > seems to be an interesting metric.
Could you figure out if the arm64 thingy started with -rt4 or was already in rt3? Sebastian
