On 11/5/20 11:35 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > This will work. Any preference on the name of this function? >
I called it in my current iteration mte_enable(), and calling it from cpu_enable_mte(). > Alternatively we can rename mte_init_tags() to something else and let > it handle both RRND and sync/async. This is an option but then you need to change the name of kasan_init_tags and the init_tags indirection name as well. I would go for the simpler and just splitting the function as per above. What do you think? -- Regards, Vincenzo
