Hi Viresh,
On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> - if (bus->opp_table) {
> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> - bus->opp_table = NULL;
> - }
> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> + bus->opp_table = NULL;
> }
>
> static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> err_reg:
> - if (!passive) {
> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> - bus->opp_table = NULL;
> - }
> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
> + bus->opp_table = NULL;
>
> return ret;
> }
>
Applied it. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
