On 11/6/20 8:46 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:09:38PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
In preparation to detect the support for system instruction
support, move the detection of the device access to the target
CPU.

Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
---
  .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c          | 45 ++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c 
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
index f038bb10bc78..308674ab746c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ static u64 etm4_get_access_type(struct etmv4_config *config);
static enum cpuhp_state hp_online; +struct etm_init_arg {
+       struct etmv4_drvdata    *drvdata;
+       struct csdev_access     *csa;
+};
+
  u64 etm4x_sysreg_read(struct csdev_access *csa,
                      u32 offset,
                      bool _relaxed,
@@ -669,6 +674,22 @@ static const struct coresight_ops etm4_cs_ops = {
        .source_ops     = &etm4_source_ops,
  };
+static bool etm_init_iomem_access(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
+                                 struct csdev_access *csa)
+{
+       *csa = CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(drvdata->base);
+       return true;
+}
+
+static bool etm_init_csdev_access(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
+                                 struct csdev_access *csa)
+{
+       if (drvdata->base)
+               return etm_init_iomem_access(drvdata, csa);
+
+       return false;
+}

I would also prefix the above two functions with "etm4_" rather than "etm_" to
follow what is already done in this file.

sure, will do.

suzuki

Reply via email to