On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:50:23 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clang warns: > > kernel/reboot.c:707:17: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration > type 'enum reboot_type' to different enumeration type 'enum reboot_mode' > [-Wenum-conversion] > reboot_mode = BOOT_TRIPLE; > ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > ... > > --- a/kernel/reboot.c > +++ b/kernel/reboot.c > @@ -704,19 +704,19 @@ static ssize_t type_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct > kobj_attribute *attr, > return -EPERM; > > if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_TRIPLE_STR, strlen(BOOT_TRIPLE_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_TRIPLE; > + reboot_type = BOOT_TRIPLE; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_KBD_STR, strlen(BOOT_KBD_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_KBD; > + reboot_type = BOOT_KBD; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_BIOS_STR, strlen(BOOT_BIOS_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_BIOS; > + reboot_type = BOOT_BIOS; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_ACPI_STR, strlen(BOOT_ACPI_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_ACPI; > + reboot_type = BOOT_ACPI; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_EFI_STR, strlen(BOOT_EFI_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_EFI; > + reboot_type = BOOT_EFI; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_CF9_FORCE_STR, strlen(BOOT_CF9_FORCE_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_CF9_FORCE; > + reboot_type = BOOT_CF9_FORCE; > else if (!strncmp(buf, BOOT_CF9_SAFE_STR, strlen(BOOT_CF9_SAFE_STR))) > - reboot_mode = BOOT_CF9_SAFE; > + reboot_type = BOOT_CF9_SAFE; > else > return -EINVAL; This is a fairly dramatic change to the original patch, but it eyeballs OK. Matteo, could you please comment? And preferably retest?
