Thus spake Albert D. Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Rather than combining open() with sendfile(), it could be combined > with stat(). Since the syscall would be new anyway, it could skip > the normal requirement about returning the next free file descriptor > in favor of returning whatever can be most quickly found. I don't know how Linux does it, but returning the first free file descriptor can be implemented as O(1) operation. Felix - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprint... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprint... dean gaudet
- Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprint... Pavel Machek
- Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprint... Pavel Machek
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-t... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-t... dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Peter Samuelson
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt