On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote: > I don't know how Linux does it, but returning the first free file > descriptor can be implemented as O(1) operation. to put it more accurately: the requirement is to be able to open(), use and close() an unlimited number of file descriptors with O(1) overhead, under any allocation pattern, with only RAM limiting the number of files. Both of my proposals attempt to provide this. It's possible to open() O(1) but do a O(log(N)) close(), but that is of no practical value IMO. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 'native files', 'object finger... Pavel Machek
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.... dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Peter Samuelson
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland