On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> The loop over all memblocks works with PFN numbers and not physical
> addresses, so we need for_each_mem_pfn_range().

Great catch! Don't know how that has been working so far. Anyway
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lan...@gmail.com>

-Sergey

> 
> Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with 
> for_each_mem_range()")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de>
> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> index 0d4253208bde..ca579deef939 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  {
>       phys_addr_t ramstart, ramend;
> -     phys_addr_t start, end;
> -     u64 i;
> +     unsigned long start, end;
> +     int i;
>  
>       ramstart = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
>       ramend = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
>  
>       min_low_pfn = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
>       max_pfn = PFN_DOWN(ramend);
> -     for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
> +     for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
>               /*
>                * Skip highmem here so we get an accurate max_low_pfn if low
>                * memory stops short of high memory.
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

Reply via email to