On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:33:10 +0100 Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:30:52AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote: > > > Running instruction decoder posttest on s390 with allyesconfig shows > > > errors. Instructions used in couple of kernel objects could not be > > > correctly decoded on big endian system. > > > > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() > > > says 5 > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please > > > report this. > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff831eb4e1: 62 d1 fd 48 7f 04 24 > > > vmovdqa64 %zmm0,(%r12) > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 7 bytes, but insn_get_length() > > > says 6 > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please > > > report this. > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff831eb4e8: 62 51 fd 48 7f 44 24 01 > > > vmovdqa64 %zmm8,0x40(%r12) > > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 8 bytes, but insn_get_length() > > > says 6 > > > > > > This is because in few places instruction field bytes are set directly > > > with further usage of "value". To address that introduce and use > > > insn_set_byte() helper, which correctly updates "value" on big endian > > > systems. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > Please let me know if this patch is good as it is or I should squash it > > > into the patch 2 of my patch series and resend it again. > > > > It all looks good to me, thanks! > > > > Masami, does this patch look good, and also patches 1-2 of the series? > > (I think you previously ACKed patch 2). > > > > Friendly ping... Sorry for replying late. Yes, I think this series and the last patch look good to me. Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> for this series. Thank you! -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>