The proc_inode_is_dead function might race with __unhash_process.
This will result in a whole bunch of stale proc entries being cached.
To prevent that, add the required locking.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <weny...@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 1bc9bcd..59720bc 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1994,7 +1994,13 @@ static int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, 
unsigned int flags)
 
 static inline bool proc_inode_is_dead(struct inode *inode)
 {
-       return !proc_pid(inode)->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID].first;
+       bool has_task;
+
+       read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+       has_task = pid_has_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
+       read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+       return !has_task;
 }
 
 int pid_delete_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry)
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to