Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > From: Dan Scally <[email protected]> > > To make sure the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() always reflects the name of i2c > devices sourced from ACPI, use it in i2c_set_dev_name(). > > Signed-off-by: Dan Scally <[email protected]> I'd squash this with 15/18, which would make it clear there's a memory leak :-) > --- > Changes since RFC v3: > > - Patch introduced > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > index 573b5da145d1..a6d4ceb01077 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c > @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void i2c_dev_set_name(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > } > > if (adev) { > - dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", acpi_dev_name(adev)); > + dev_set_name(&client->dev, i2c_acpi_dev_name(adev)); > return; > } > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
