Friendly ping. If there are not other reservations, can we pick this patch? It doesn't depend on any other patch series.
Thanks, On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:32 PM Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:03:05PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote: > > On occasion, the Chrome Embedded Controller (EC) can send a mux > > configuration which doesn't map to a particular data mode. For instance, > > dedicated Type C chargers, when connected, may cause only > > USB_PD_MUX_POLARITY_INVERTED to be set. This is a valid flag combination > > and should not lead to a driver abort. > > > > Modify the mux configuration handling to not return an error when an > > unrecognized mux flag combination is encountered. Concordantly, make the > > ensuing print a debug level print so as to not pollute the kernel logs. > > > > Cc: Keith Short <keithsh...@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmal...@chromium.org> > > FWIW: > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 7 +++---- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > > b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > > index ce031a10eb1b..5b8db02ab84a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > > @@ -537,10 +537,9 @@ static int cros_typec_configure_mux(struct > > cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num, > > port->state.mode = TYPEC_STATE_USB; > > ret = typec_mux_set(port->mux, &port->state); > > } else { > > - dev_info(typec->dev, > > - "Unsupported mode requested, mux flags: %x\n", > > - mux_flags); > > - ret = -ENOTSUPP; > > + dev_dbg(typec->dev, > > + "Unrecognized mode requested, mux flags: %x\n", > > + mux_flags); > > } > > > > return ret; > > -- > > 2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog > > thanks, > > -- > heikki