On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:08 AM Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:29, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:23 AM Tigran Aivazian > > > No, this is not an issue. In the latest change to BFS I added the > > > following comment to the header fs/bfs/bfs.h, which explains it: > > > > > > /* In theory BFS supports up to 512 inodes, numbered from 2 (for /) up > > > to 513 inclusive. > > > In actual fact, attempting to create the 512th inode (i.e. inode > > > No. 513 or file No. 511) > > > will fail with ENOSPC in bfs_add_entry(): the root directory cannot > > > contain so many entries, counting '..'. > > > So, mkfs.bfs(8) should really limit its -N option to 511 and not > > > 512. For now, we just print a warning > > > if a filesystem is mounted with such "impossible to fill up" number > > > of inodes */ > > > > There are rules for use of "WARNING" in output required to support > > kernel testing: > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/asm-generic/bug.h#L67-L80 > > This seems to be triggerable by exteranal inputs and breaks these rules. > > Thank you, I didn't know about these rules. Ok, then, since this > warning does not "need prompt attention if it should ever occur at > runtime", the easiest solution is to change "WARNING" to lower case > "warning" in that printk in fs/bfs/inode.c: > > --- fs/bfs/inode.c.0 2020-09-28 10:03:00.658549556 +0100 > +++ fs/bfs/inode.c 2020-09-28 10:03:05.408548250 +0100 > @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ > > info->si_lasti = (le32_to_cpu(bfs_sb->s_start) - BFS_BSIZE) / > sizeof(struct bfs_inode) + BFS_ROOT_INO - 1; > if (info->si_lasti == BFS_MAX_LASTI) > - printf("WARNING: filesystem %s was created with 512 inodes, the real > maximum is 511, mounting anyway\n", s->s_id); > + printf("warning: filesystem %s was created with 512 inodes, the real > maximum is 511, mounting anyway\n", s->s_id); > else if (info->si_lasti > BFS_MAX_LASTI) { > printf("Impossible last inode number %lu > %d on %s\n", > info->si_lasti, BFS_MAX_LASTI, s->s_id); > goto out1; > > If you want to submit this patch to the appropriate place(s), feel > free to do this -- I approve it. If the comment in asm/bug.h is > inaccurate and its mention of "BUG/WARNING" implies the lowercase > "bug/warning" also, then one can remove the prefix "warning: " from > the patch altogether and proper case "filesystem" to "Filesystem". > > Kind regards, > Tigran > > Acked-By: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tig...@gmail.com> > Approved-By: Tigran Aivazian <aivazian.tig...@gmail.com>
#syz fix: bfs: don't use WARNING: string when it's just info.