On 2020-12-08 09:21, Pingfan Liu wrote:
Although there is a runtime WARN_ON() when NR_IPR > max SGI, it had
better
do the check during built time, and associate these related code
together.
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelf...@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <ja...@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 2 +-
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 18e9727..9fc383c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_WAKEUP,
NR_IPI
};
+static_assert(NR_IPI <= MAX_SGI_NUM);
I am trying *very hard* to remove dependencies between the architecture
code and random drivers, so this kind of check really is
counter-productive.
Driver code should not have to know the number of IPIs, because there is
no requirement that all IPIs should map 1:1 to SGIs. Conflating the two
is already wrong, and I really don't want to add more of that.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
