On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:25:30 +0100 Marco Elver <el...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:29, Miguel Ojeda > <miguel.ojeda.sando...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:35 AM Marco Elver <el...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > It looks like there's no clear MAINTAINER for this. :-/ > > > It'd still be good to fix this for 5.11. > > > > Richard seems to be the author, not sure if he picks patches (CC'd). > > > > I guess Masahiro or akpm (Cc'd) would be two options; otherwise, I > > could pick it up through compiler attributes (stretching the > > definition...). > > Thanks for the info. I did find that there's an alternative patch to > fix _Static_assert() with genksyms that was sent 3 days after mine > (it's simpler, but might miss cases). I've responded there ( > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/x9ji5kpwoo23w...@elver.google.com ). > > Now we have some choice. I'd argue for this patch, because it's not > doing preprocessor workarounds, but in the end I won't make that call. > :-) I have https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203230955.1482058-1-a...@kernel.org queued for later this week.
