On 10-12-20, 11:17, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The previous call to update_freq_counters_refs() has already updated the > per-cpu variables, don't overwrite them with the same value again. > > Fixes: 4b9cf23c179a ("arm64: wrap and generalise counter read functions") > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > index c8308befdb1e..f6faa697e83e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ void topology_scale_freq_tick(void) > > if (unlikely(core_cnt <= prev_core_cnt || > const_cnt <= prev_const_cnt)) > - goto store_and_exit; > + return; > > /* > * /\core arch_max_freq_scale > @@ -331,10 +331,6 @@ void topology_scale_freq_tick(void) > > scale = min_t(unsigned long, scale, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE); > this_cpu_write(freq_scale, (unsigned long)scale); > - > -store_and_exit: > - this_cpu_write(arch_core_cycles_prev, core_cnt); > - this_cpu_write(arch_const_cycles_prev, const_cnt); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
Catalin: Can you please pick this up for 5.11-rc1, the earlier patch (from fixes) is already in your tree. Thanks. -- viresh