Hello,
On 11/12/2020 10:31:43+0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
> we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
> " AT91: Could not find identification node"
>
> Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.
>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com>
> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroc...@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> index c4472b68b7c2..ba9fc07cd91c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> @@ -271,8 +271,19 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct
> at91_soc *socs)
> return soc_dev;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260", },
> + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2", },
This is a very small subset of the supported SoCs. a proper list would
be:
atmel,at91rm9200
atmel,at91sam9
atmel,sama5
atmel,samv7
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
