On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:27 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:25 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Oh yeah, I forgot about that.  That would be another option if my patch
> > doesn't work out.
> 
> Well, one option is to just say "ok, we know gcc generates horrible
> code that falls through to another function in a situation that we
> claim is unreachable, so let's not claim it is unreachable".
> 
> IOW, the problem here is that the compiler fundamentally isn't smart
> enough to see that something is unreachable, and the "unreachable()"
> annotation we did didn't actually really cause any code that makes it
> so. So we basically have code that _if_ we ever change it, it will
> simply be wrong, and we'll never see any warnings about it but it will
> fall through to nonsensical code.
> 
> So maybe the option here is simply "objtool was right before, the
> unreachable() is fragile and wrong".
> 
> We can easily write that case statement in a way that actually makes
> the compiler generate better code and avoids the issue by just making
> case 0x00 also be the default case.
> 
> So I think I'll just apply this patch instead.

Using default somewhere other than the bottom of a switch/case block
isn't common/pretty.  It's easy to visually skip/glaze over.

Perhaps reorder the block.
Maybe add static to the const arrays too.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 74f5a3197214..53b7bb281edb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -3089,8 +3089,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
        struct drm_display_mode *newmode;
        struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
        struct cvt_timing *cvt;
-       const int rates[] = { 60, 85, 75, 60, 50 };
-       const u8 empty[3] = { 0, 0, 0 };
+       static const int rates[] = { 60, 85, 75, 60, 50 };
+       static const u8 empty[3] = { 0, 0, 0 };
 
        for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
                int width, height;
@@ -3102,20 +3102,18 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector 
*connector,
 
                height = (cvt->code[0] + ((cvt->code[1] & 0xf0) << 4) + 1) * 2;
                switch (cvt->code[1] & 0x0c) {
-               case 0x00:
-                       width = height * 4 / 3;
-                       break;
-               case 0x04:
-                       width = height * 16 / 9;
+               case 0x0c:
+                       width = height * 15 / 9;
                        break;
                case 0x08:
                        width = height * 16 / 10;
                        break;
-               case 0x0c:
-                       width = height * 15 / 9;
+               case 0x04:
+                       width = height * 16 / 9;
                        break;
                default:
-                       unreachable();
+                       width = height * 4 / 3;
+                       break;
                }
 
                for (j = 1; j < 5; j++) {


Reply via email to