On 2020-12-14 22:32, Bean Huo wrote:
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 19:41 -0800, Can Guo wrote:Fixes: 88a92d6ae4fe ("scsi: ufs: Serialize eh_work with system PM events and async scan")Signed-off-by: Can Guo <c...@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index c1c401b..ef155a9 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -8883,8 +8883,11 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba) int ret = 0; ktime_t start = ktime_get(); + if (!hba) + return 0; + down(&hba->eh_sem); - if (!hba || !hba->is_powered) + if (!hba->is_powered) return 0;Can, why not moving down(&hba->eh_sem) after "return 0;"?
In your way, if hba is not powered, ufshcd_system_suspend() returns 0, which is a successful suspend. When ufshcd_system_resume() is called, if hba is not powered, it goes to out and does up(&hba->eh_sem), which shall cause unbalance to eh_sem. Thanks, Can Guo.
