On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 04:19:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:50:54PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > - ret2 = errseq_check_and_advance(&sb->s_wb_err, &f.file->f_sb_err); > > + if (sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance) > > + ret2 = sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance(sb, f.file); > > What a terrible name for an fs operation. You don't seem to be able > to distinguish between semantics and implementation. How about > check_error()?
check_error() sounds better. I was not very happy with the name either. Thought of starting with something. Vivek
