On 22-12-20, 22:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 22.12.2020 11:59, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > On 17-12-20, 21:06, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> A required OPP may not be available, and thus, all OPPs which are using
> >> this required OPP should be unavailable too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/opp/core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Please send a separate patchset for fixes, as these can also go to 5.11
> > itself.
>
> Alright, although I don't think that this patch fixes any problems for
> existing OPP users.
Because nobody is using this feature, but otherwise this is a fix for me.
> >> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> >> index d9feb7639598..3d02fe33630b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> >> @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp
> >> *new_opp,
> >> struct opp_table *opp_table, bool rate_not_available)
> >> {
> >> struct list_head *head;
> >> - int ret;
> >> + int i, ret;
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock);
> >> head = &opp_table->opp_list;
> >> @@ -1615,6 +1615,15 @@ int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp
> >> *new_opp,
> >> __func__, new_opp->rate);
> >> }
> >>
> >> + for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count && new_opp->available;
> >> i++) {
> >> + if (new_opp->required_opps[i]->available)
> >> + continue;
> >> +
> >> + new_opp->available = false;
> >> + dev_warn(dev, "%s: OPP not supported by required OPP %pOF
> >> (%lu)\n",
> >> + __func__, new_opp->required_opps[i]->np,
> >> new_opp->rate);
> >
> > Why not just break from here ?
>
> The new_opp could be already marked as unavailable by a previous voltage
> check, hence this loop should be skipped entirely in that case.
Then add a separate check for that before the loop as we don't need that check
on every iteration here.
--
viresh
