On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:57:04 +0100 "Remy Bohmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Haavard, > > Sorry.. But I get an Oops on Preempt-RT with the latest set of > patches. I did not see it earlier today with the other set of patches. Hmm...from the backtrace, it looks like lock recursion -- port->lock is held for the whole duration of the tasklet, but we somehow end up in uart_start(), which grabs the lock again. Could you try the patch below? It's a bit strange that you got an oops though... Haavard diff --git a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c index 7967054..948c643 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c +++ b/drivers/serial/atmel_serial.c @@ -666,7 +666,13 @@ static void atmel_rx_from_ring(struct uart_port *port) uart_insert_char(port, status, ATMEL_US_OVRE, c.ch, flg); } + /* + * Drop the lock here since it might end up calling + * uart_start(), which takes the lock. + */ + spin_unlock(&port->lock); tty_flip_buffer_push(port->info->tty); + spin_lock(&port->lock); } static void atmel_rx_from_dma(struct uart_port *port) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/