On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 01:05:26PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/28/2020 12:23 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 01:57:40PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>>> Konstantin, would you be willing to mod the kernel.org instance of > >>>> patchwork to populate Fixes tags in the generated mboxes? > >>> > >>> I'd really rather not -- we try not to diverge from project upstream if > >>> at all > >>> possible, as this dramatically complicates upgrades. > >> > >> Well that is really unfortunate then because the Linux developer > >> community settled on using the Fixes: tag for years now and having > >> patchwork automatically append those tags would greatly help maintainers. > > > > I agree -- but this is something that needs to be implemented upstream. > > Picking up a one-off patch just for patchwork.kernel.org is not the right > > way > > to go about this. > > You should be able to tune this from the patchwork administrative > interface and add new tags there, would not that be acceptable?
Oh, oops, I got confused by the mention of a rejected upstream patch -- I didn't realize that this is already possible with a configuration setting. Sure, I added a match for ^Fixes: -- let me know if it's not doing the right thing. -K
