32 bits architectures do not support u64 division, so the macro
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is not adequate as the compiler will replace the
call to an unexisting function for the platform, leading to an
unresolved symbols.
Fix this by using the compatible macros:
DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST and DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/powercap/dtpm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
index 5b6857e9b064..0abcc439d728 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm.c
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ static void __dtpm_rebalance_weight(struct dtpm *dtpm)
pr_debug("Setting weight '%d' for '%s'\n",
child->weight, child->zone.name);
- child->weight = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(child->power_max * 1024,
- dtpm->power_max);
+ child->weight = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(
+ child->power_max * 1024, dtpm->power_max);
__dtpm_rebalance_weight(child);
}
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int __set_power_limit_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm, int cid,
u64 power_limit)
} else if (power_limit == dtpm->power_min) {
power = child->power_min;
} else {
- power = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(
+ power = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(
power_limit * child->weight, 1024);
}
--
2.17.1
