On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> check_iommu_entries() checks for cyclic dependency in iommu entries
> and fixes the cyclic dependency by setting x->depend to NULL. But
> this repairing isn't correct if q is in front of p, there will be
> "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID!" report following. Fix it by NULLing
> whichever in the front.
> 
> The second issue is about the report of exectuion order reverse,
> the order is reversed incorrectly in the report, fix it.

Heya!

When you debugged this, did you by any chance save the
serial logs and the debug logs to double-check it?

Thanks!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> index 2e9006c..40c8249 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-iommu_table.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ void __init check_iommu_entries(struct iommu_table_entry 
> *start,
>                       printk(KERN_ERR "CYCLIC DEPENDENCY FOUND! %pS depends 
> on %pS and vice-versa. BREAKING IT.\n",
>                              p->detect, q->detect);
>                       /* Heavy handed way..*/
> -                     x->depend = NULL;
> +                     if (p > q)
> +                             q->depend = NULL;
> +                     else
> +                             p->depend = NULL;
>               }
>       }
>  
> @@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ void __init check_iommu_entries(struct iommu_table_entry 
> *start,
>               q = find_dependents_of(p, finish, p);
>               if (q && q > p) {
>                       printk(KERN_ERR "EXECUTION ORDER INVALID! %pS should be 
> called before %pS!\n",
> -                            p->detect, q->detect);
> +                            q->detect, p->detect);
>               }
>       }
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Reply via email to