On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This continues in applying the CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION tests where > appropriate, and pulling similar CONFIGs under the same check. Most > notably, this adds the checks to refcount_t so that system builders can > Oops their kernels when encountering a potential refcounter attack. (And > so now the LKDTM tests for refcount issues pass correctly.) > > The series depends on the changes in -next made to lib/refcount.c, > so it might be easiest if this goes through the locking tree... > > v2 is a rebase to -next and adjusts to using WARN_ONCE() instead of WARN(). > > -Kees > > v1 was here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/6/720
Ping? Just wondering what ever happened to this 3+ year old series... -- Josh
