On 06.01.2021 01:58, Yang Shi wrote:
> Currently the number of deferred objects are per shrinker, but some slabs, 
> for example,
> vfs inode/dentry cache are per memcg, this would result in poor isolation 
> among memcgs.
> 
> The deferred objects typically are generated by __GFP_NOFS allocations, one 
> memcg with
> excessive __GFP_NOFS allocations may blow up deferred objects, then other 
> innocent memcgs
> may suffer from over shrink, excessive reclaim latency, etc.
> 
> For example, two workloads run in memcgA and memcgB respectively, workload in 
> B is vfs
> heavy workload.  Workload in A generates excessive deferred objects, then B's 
> vfs cache
> might be hit heavily (drop half of caches) by B's limit reclaim or global 
> reclaim.
> 
> We observed this hit in our production environment which was running vfs 
> heavy workload
> shown as the below tracing log:
> 
> <...>-409454 [016] .... 28286961.747146: mm_shrink_slab_start: 
> super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9a83046f3458:
> nid: 1 objects to shrink 3641681686040 gfp_flags 
> GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO pgs_scanned 1 lru_pgs 15721
> cache items 246404277 delta 31345 total_scan 123202138
> <...>-409454 [022] .... 28287105.928018: mm_shrink_slab_end: 
> super_cache_scan+0x0/0x1a0 ffff9a83046f3458:
> nid: 1 unused scan count 3641681686040 new scan count 3641798379189 
> total_scan 602
> last shrinker return val 123186855
> 
> The vfs cache and page cache ration was 10:1 on this machine, and half of 
> caches were dropped.
> This also resulted in significant amount of page caches were dropped due to 
> inodes eviction.
> 
> Make nr_deferred per memcg for memcg aware shrinkers would solve the 
> unfairness and bring
> better isolation.
> 
> When memcg is not enabled (!CONFIG_MEMCG or memcg disabled), the shrinker's 
> nr_deferred
> would be used.  And non memcg aware shrinkers use shrinker's nr_deferred all 
> the time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  7 +++---
>  mm/vmscan.c                | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index e05bbe8277cc..5599082df623 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -93,12 +93,13 @@ struct lruvec_stat {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * Bitmap of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware shrinkers,
> - * which have elements charged to this memcg.
> + * Bitmap and deferred work of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware
> + * shrinkers, which have elements charged to this memcg.
>   */
>  struct memcg_shrinker_info {
>       struct rcu_head rcu;
> -     unsigned long map[];
> +     unsigned long *map;
> +     atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0033659abf9e..72259253e414 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -193,10 +193,12 @@ static void memcg_free_shrinker_info_rcu(struct 
> rcu_head *head)
>  }
>  
>  static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> -                                       int size, int old_size)
> +                                       int m_size, int d_size,
> +                                       int old_m_size, int old_d_size)
>  {
>       struct memcg_shrinker_info *new, *old;
>       int nid;
> +     int size = m_size + d_size;
>  
>       for_each_node(nid) {
>               old = rcu_dereference_protected(
> @@ -209,9 +211,18 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_info(struct 
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
>               if (!new)
>                       return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -             /* Set all old bits, clear all new bits */
> -             memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_size);
> -             memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
> +             new->map = (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)new + sizeof(*new));
> +             new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)((unsigned long)new +
> +                                     sizeof(*new) + m_size);

Can't we write this more compact?

                new->map = (unsigned long *)(new + 1);
                new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t)(new->map + 1);

> +
> +             /* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */
> +             memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_m_size);
> +             memset((void *)new->map + old_m_size, 0, m_size - old_m_size);
> +             /* nr_deferred: copy old values, clear all new values */
> +             memcpy((void *)new->nr_deferred, (void *)old->nr_deferred,
> +                    old_d_size);

Why not
                memcpy(new->nr_deferred, old->nr_deferred, old_d_size);
?

> +             memset((void *)new->nr_deferred + old_d_size, 0,
> +                    d_size - old_d_size);
>  
>               rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, new);
>               call_rcu(&old->rcu, memcg_free_shrinker_info_rcu);
> @@ -226,9 +237,6 @@ void memcg_free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>       struct memcg_shrinker_info *info;
>       int nid;
>  
> -     if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> -             return;
> -
>       for_each_node(nid) {
>               pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
>               info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
> @@ -242,12 +250,13 @@ int memcg_alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
>       struct memcg_shrinker_info *info;
>       int nid, size, ret = 0;
> -
> -     if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> -             return 0;
> +     int m_size, d_size = 0;
>  
>       down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> -     size = DIV_ROUND_UP(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned 
> long);
> +     m_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned 
> long);
> +     d_size = shrinker_nr_max * sizeof(atomic_long_t);
> +     size = m_size + d_size;
> +
>       for_each_node(nid) {
>               info = kvzalloc(sizeof(*info) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (!info) {
> @@ -255,6 +264,9 @@ int memcg_alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                       ret = -ENOMEM;
>                       break;
>               }
> +             info->map = (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)info + 
> sizeof(*info));
> +             info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)((unsigned long)info +
> +                                     sizeof(*info) + m_size);
>               rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
>       }
>       up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> @@ -265,10 +277,16 @@ int memcg_alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  static int memcg_expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
>  {
>       int size, old_size, ret = 0;
> +     int m_size, d_size = 0;
> +     int old_m_size, old_d_size = 0;
>       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  
> -     size = DIV_ROUND_UP(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> -     old_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * 
> sizeof(unsigned long);
> +     m_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned 
> long);
> +     d_size = (new_id + 1) * sizeof(atomic_long_t);
> +     size = m_size + d_size;
> +     old_m_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * 
> sizeof(unsigned long);
> +     old_d_size = shrinker_nr_max * sizeof(atomic_long_t);
> +     old_size = old_m_size + old_d_size;
>       if (size <= old_size)
>               return 0;

This replication of patch [4/11] looks awkwardly. Please, try to incorporate
the same changes to nr_deferred as I requested for shrinker_map in [4/11].

>  
> @@ -277,9 +295,8 @@ static int memcg_expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
>  
>       memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
>       do {
> -             if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> -                     continue;
> -             ret = memcg_expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, size, old_size);
> +             ret = memcg_expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, m_size, d_size,
> +                                                  old_m_size, old_d_size);
>               if (ret) {
>                       mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
>                       goto out;
> 

Reply via email to