On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:42 PM dancol <dan...@dancol.org> wrote: > > On 2021-01-06 21:09, Paul Moore wrote: > > Is it necessary to pass both the context_inode pointer and the secure > > boolean? It seems like if context_inode is non-NULL then one could > > assume that a secure anonymous inode was requested; is there ever > > going to be a case where this is not true? > > The converse isn't true though: it makes sense to ask for a secure inode > with a NULL context inode.
Having looked at patch 3/4 and 4/4 I just realized that and was coming back to update my comments :) -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
