On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:22:05PM -0600, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:49:20 -0600, Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@kernel.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Add synchronize_srcu_expedited() to sgx_encl_release() to catch a grace
> > period initiated by sgx_mmu_notifier_release().
> >
> > A trivial example of a failing sequence with tasks A and B:
> >
> > 1. A: -> sgx_release()
> > 2. B: -> sgx_mmu_notifier_release()
> > 3. B: -> list_del_rcu()
> > 3. A: -> sgx_encl_release()
> > 4. A: -> cleanup_srcu_struct()
> >
> > The loop in sgx_release() observes an empty list because B has removed
> > its
> > entry in the middle, and calls cleanup_srcu_struct() before B has a
> > chance
> > to calls synchronize_srcu().
> >
> > Fixes: 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer")
> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com>
> > Suggested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.hu...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v3: Fine-tuned tags, and added missing change log for v2.
> > v2: Switch to synchronize_srcu_expedited().
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> > index ee50a5010277..fe7256db6e73 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> > @@ -438,6 +438,12 @@ void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref)
> > if (encl->backing)
> > fput(encl->backing);
> > + /*
> > + * Each sgx_mmu_notifier_release() starts a grace period. Therefore, an
> > + * additional sync is required here.
> > + */
> > + synchronize_srcu_expedited(&encl->srcu);
> > +
> > cleanup_srcu_struct(&encl->srcu);
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&encl->mm_list));
>
> Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.hu...@linux.intel.com>
Thanks.
/Jarkko
