On 1/13/21 6:37 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Query max_sev_asid directly after setting it instead of bouncing through
> its wrapper, svm_sev_enabled().  Using the wrapper is unnecessary
> obfuscation.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

thanks

Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.si...@amd.com>

>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 02a66008e9b9..1a143340103e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -1278,8 +1278,7 @@ void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
>  
>       /* Maximum number of encrypted guests supported simultaneously */
>       max_sev_asid = ecx;
> -
> -     if (!svm_sev_enabled())
> +     if (!max_sev_asid)
>               goto out;
>  
>       /* Minimum ASID value that should be used for SEV guest */

Reply via email to