From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

Rename tape_3590_erp_succeded to tape_3590_erp_succeeded to fix a
spelling mistake in the function name.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c b/drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c
index ecf8c5006a0e..0d484fe43d7e 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ tape_3590_done(struct tape_device *device, struct 
tape_request *request)
  * This function is called, when error recovery was successful
  */
 static inline int
-tape_3590_erp_succeded(struct tape_device *device, struct tape_request 
*request)
+tape_3590_erp_succeeded(struct tape_device *device, struct tape_request 
*request)
 {
        DBF_EVENT(3, "Error Recovery successful for %s\n",
                  tape_op_verbose[request->op]);
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ tape_3590_erp_basic(struct tape_device *device, struct 
tape_request *request,
        case SENSE_BRA_PER:
                return tape_3590_erp_failed(device, request, irb, rc);
        case SENSE_BRA_CONT:
-               return tape_3590_erp_succeded(device, request);
+               return tape_3590_erp_succeeded(device, request);
        case SENSE_BRA_RE:
                return tape_3590_erp_retry(device, request, irb);
        case SENSE_BRA_DRE:
-- 
2.29.2

Reply via email to