On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> From: CK Hu <ck...@mediatek.com>
>
> mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
>
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck...@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang...@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 30 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h | 26 +-
> 5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
[...]
>
> -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> - .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> + .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> - .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> + .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> - .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> + .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> - .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> + .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> {},
> };
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
mdp driver. Make sense?
Regards,
Matthias
