On 21. 01. 21, 2:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:44 PM Linus Torvalds
<[email protected]> wrote:

I'll come back to this tomorrow and do the line-buffered icanon case
too (unless pull requests pile up), and then I'll be happy with the
tty changes, and I think I can submit this series for real to Greg.

Greg, I don't know how you want to handle this.

I have a branch with my tty splice patches at

     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git tty-splice

and that now includes doing that "cookie continuation" thing even for
the N_TTY icanon modes.

It passes my local tests, and I did try a few rather odd things. And
Oliver tested an ealier version without that final commit on his load.
But...

Hm, I would like to review this first. I noticed the changes only because a new branch appeared when I grabbed your tree and the branch has "tty" in its name.

So for example:

@@ -1038,18 +1045,15 @@ static ssize_t tty_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *buf,
        if (tty->ops->write_room == NULL)
                tty_err(tty, "missing write_room method\n");
        ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
-       if (!ld)
-               return hung_up_tty_write(file, buf, count, ppos);
-       if (!ld->ops->write)
+       if (!ld || !ld->ops->write)
                ret = -EIO;
        else
-               ret = do_tty_write(ld->ops->write, tty, file, buf, count);
+               ret = do_tty_write(ld->ops->write, tty, file, from);
        tty_ldisc_deref(ld);

if ld == NULL => crash here.

So can you send the patches to the list and Cc me too?

        return ret;
 }
thanks,
--
js

Reply via email to