On 1/19/21 12:49 PM, Tom Rix wrote: > On 1/5/21 3:08 PM, Russ Weight wrote: > > ... > >> .../testing/sysfs-driver-intel-m10-bmc-secure | 61 ++ >> MAINTAINERS | 2 + >> drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 11 + >> drivers/fpga/Makefile | 3 + >> drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c | 543 ++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h | 85 +++ > I am having trouble pulling this into my testing branch where i am tracking > some other changes to intel-m10-bmc.h > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210114231648.199685-1-russell.h.wei...@intel.com/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1609999628-12748-3-git-send-email-yilun...@intel.com/ > > so I am wondering if it makes sense to split the intel-m10-bmc.h change out > of this patchset and sent as a single patch to mfd subsystem ? The change is > a bunch of #defines that don't do anything on their own, but will conflict > with other similar additions to the h file. If I rebase my working branch onto the latest linux-next, I don't see any issues. But if I apply the patches to the latest linux-next (git am), then I do. Clearly I need to fix up this patch and resend. If there are no objections, I'll split this patch out as an individual patch for the next submission. - Russ > > Tom > >> 6 files changed, 705 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel-m10-bmc-secure >> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c >>
