Hi Christop:

在 2021/1/28 星期四 上午 1:37, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
But the old code is also completely broken.  We can't just OR in
the op, as that implicitly assumes the old op was 0 (REQ_OP_READ).


Yes, indeed, there is an assume that the op is just possible to be 0 (REQ_OP_READ) or 1 (REQ_OP_WRITE).

REQ_OP_WRITE is from cached_dev_submit_bio() which would be submitted by upper user.

REQ_OP_READ is from bcache itself, such as cached_dev_read_done() (when we found cache miss, we will read

data from backing and then we want to insert it into cache device. then there is a read bio with data reach here, we

need to set the bio_op to REQ_OP_WRITE, and send this bio to cache device).

Please fix this to explicitly set the exact op and flags that you want
instead of this fragile magic.blk_rq_map_kern

This commit only want to fix the logic bug introduced in ad0d9e76a412 ("bcache: use bio op accessors"),

that's more likely a partial revert.


I agree that we can make it more clearly and explicitly.

But I found there is no accessor to set op only, besides, the bio_set_op_attrs() was marked as obsolete.

There are some others doing similar things as below:

blk_rq_map_kern():

bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;

bio->bi_opf |= req_op(rq);


So what about below:

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index c7cadaafa947..bacc7366002f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -244,7 +244,14 @@ static void bch_data_insert_start(struct closure *cl)
                trace_bcache_cache_insert(k);
                bch_keylist_push(&op->insert_keys);

-               bio_set_op_attrs(n, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
+               /*
+                * n here would be REQ_OP_READ, if
+                * we are inserting data read from
+                * backing device in cache miss or
+                * inserting data in movinggc.
+                */
+               n->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
+               n->bi_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
                bch_submit_bbio(n, op->c, k, 0);
        } while (n != bio);


Thanx

Yang

Reply via email to