On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote: > Hi Peter & Jason,
Hi, Gal, Jason, > > It seems the hugetlb part was overlooked? > We're testing if the RDMA fork MADV_DONTFORK stuff can be removed on > appropriate > kernels, but our tests still fail due to lacking explicit huge pages support > [1]. I didn't think it high priority only because I think most hugetlbfs users should be using it shared, but maybe I'm wrong.. Then it got lost indeed. But I definitely agree it should better be there. > > Peter, was it left unchanged on purpose? > Are you planning to submit the hugetlb changes as well? > > [1] https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/883#issuecomment-770398171 > I'll prepare a fix soon and post it. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
