On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 22:14, Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:42:57PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > +static phys_addr_t sprd_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > +                                        dma_addr_t iova)
> > +{
> > +     struct sprd_iommu_domain *dom = to_sprd_domain(domain);
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +     phys_addr_t pa;
> > +     unsigned long start = domain->geometry.aperture_start;
> > +     unsigned long end = domain->geometry.aperture_end;
> > +
> > +     if (iova < start || iova > end)
> > +             pr_err("iova (0x%llx) exceed the vpn range[0x%lx-0x%lx]!\n",
> > +                    iova, start, end);
>
> It is not a good idea to continue here with an out-of-range iova. The
> code below might access random memory for its checks. Better do a
> WARN_ON here and return an invalid physical address.

Yes, I will fix this.

Thanks,
Chunyan

>
> > +
> > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&dom->pgtlock, flags);
> > +     pa = *(dom->pgt_va + ((iova - start) >> SPRD_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT));
> > +     pa = (pa << SPRD_IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT) + ((iova - start) & 
> > (SPRD_IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE - 1));
> > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dom->pgtlock, flags);
> > +
> > +     return pa;
> > +}
> > +

Reply via email to