On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:23:59 +0000
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:10:34PM +0800, samirweng1979 wrote:
> > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com>
> >
> > change 'regster' to 'register'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com>
>
> It looks like the Subject line might not be correct for this patch?
>
> Is it really the first time this patch has been circulated or should
> it have been tagged RESEND or v2?
>
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > index a77df59..e149a0a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static char *gdb_hex_reg_helper(int regnum,
> > char *out) dbg_reg_def[i].size);
> > }
> >
> > -/* Handle the 'p' individual regster get */
> > +/* Handle the 'p' individual register get */
> > static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> > {
> > unsigned long regnum;
> > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state
> > *ks) gdb_hex_reg_helper(regnum, remcom_out_buffer);
> > }
> >
> > -/* Handle the 'P' individual regster set */
> > +/* Handle the 'P' individual register set */
> > static void gdb_cmd_reg_set(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> > {
> > unsigned long regnum;
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
Hi Daniel,
The patch was first sent on January 25, but nobody relply me, so I
just resend the patch, and the patch is the same as last time,does I
need add RESEND tag? thanks.
