On Thu 2021-02-04 15:59:21, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 2/4/21 3:49 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >This machine is insecure. Yet I don't see ascii-art *** all around.. > > > >"Kernel memory addresses are exposed, which is bad for security." > > I'll use whatever wording everyone can agree on, but I really don't see much > difference between "which may compromise security on your system" and "which > is bad for security". "may compromise" doesn't see any more alarmist than > "bad". Frankly, "bad" is a very generic term.
Well, I agree that "bad" is vague.... but original wording is simply
untrue, as printing addresses decreases robustness but can't introduce
security problem on its own.
Being alarmist is not my complaint; being untrue is.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
