Do code format alignment to clean code style issues.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongj...@huawei.com>
---
 net/core/neighbour.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 9500d28a43b0..a742c918a09b 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct 
net_device *dev,
                struct neighbour __rcu **np = &nht->hash_buckets[i];
 
                while ((n = rcu_dereference_protected(*np,
-                                       lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock))) != NULL) {
+                                                     
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock))) != NULL) {
                        if (dev && n->dev != dev) {
                                np = &n->next;
                                continue;
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct 
net_device *dev,
                                continue;
                        }
                        rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
-                                  rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
+                                          rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
                                                lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
                        write_lock(&n->lock);
                        neigh_del_timer(n);
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static struct neighbour *___neigh_create(struct neigh_table 
*tbl,
                                            lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock));
             n1 != NULL;
             n1 = rcu_dereference_protected(n1->next,
-                       lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock))) {
+                                           lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock))) {
                if (dev == n1->dev && !memcmp(n1->primary_key, n->primary_key, 
key_len)) {
                        if (want_ref)
                                neigh_hold(n1);
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static void neigh_periodic_work(struct work_struct *work)
         * BASE_REACHABLE_TIME.
         */
        queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &tbl->gc_work,
-                             NEIGH_VAR(&tbl->parms, BASE_REACHABLE_TIME) >> 1);
+                          NEIGH_VAR(&tbl->parms, BASE_REACHABLE_TIME) >> 1);
        write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock);
 }
 
@@ -1620,8 +1620,7 @@ struct neigh_parms *neigh_parms_alloc(struct net_device 
*dev,
        if (p) {
                p->tbl            = tbl;
                refcount_set(&p->refcnt, 1);
-               p->reachable_time =
-                               neigh_rand_reach_time(NEIGH_VAR(p, 
BASE_REACHABLE_TIME));
+               p->reachable_time = neigh_rand_reach_time(NEIGH_VAR(p, 
BASE_REACHABLE_TIME));
                dev_hold(dev);
                p->dev = dev;
                write_pnet(&p->net, net);
@@ -1693,7 +1692,7 @@ void neigh_table_init(int index, struct neigh_table *tbl)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
        if (!proc_create_seq_data(tbl->id, 0, init_net.proc_net_stat,
-                             &neigh_stat_seq_ops, tbl))
+                                 &neigh_stat_seq_ops, tbl))
                panic("cannot create neighbour proc dir entry");
 #endif
 
@@ -1714,10 +1713,10 @@ void neigh_table_init(int index, struct neigh_table 
*tbl)
        rwlock_init(&tbl->lock);
        INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&tbl->gc_work, neigh_periodic_work);
        queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &tbl->gc_work,
-                       tbl->parms.reachable_time);
+                          tbl->parms.reachable_time);
        timer_setup(&tbl->proxy_timer, neigh_proxy_process, 0);
        skb_queue_head_init_class(&tbl->proxy_queue,
-                       &neigh_table_proxy_queue_class);
+                                 &neigh_table_proxy_queue_class);
 
        tbl->last_flush = now;
        tbl->last_rand  = now + tbl->parms.reachable_time * 20;
-- 
2.22.0

Reply via email to